Earlier this month, ChemBark sent a questionnaire to the three current candidates for ACS President-Elect. The set of questions was similar to the set distributed last year that Tom Barton was kind enough to answer.
ChemBark is publishing each candidate’s response—complete and unedited—in dedicated posts. Dr. Chuck Kolb’s answers and Dr. Bryan Balazs answers ran in previous posts. The next candidate to respond is Dr. Diane Schmidt (whose response was delayed due to jury duty). Her answers appear below.
Don’t forget to vote in the ACS national elections!
Response of Dr. Diane Schmidt, Candidate for ACS President-Elect
1. What are your thoughts about the historically low voter turnout (~15%) typical of ACS national elections?
Apathy is difficult to cure. One suggestion would be to have greater publicity in C&EN (perhaps a cover article) to raise the profile and awareness of the national elections. The option to vote electronically does not appear to have had the impact of greater participation in the national elections that was expected.
2. What is your stance regarding the fees that ACS Publications charges companies and universities to access journals?
Journal pricing is complex and is probably best understood by dealing in specifics for specific schools and companies rather than generalities. When I get these questions, I always refer people to Pubs. In many cases there are custom solutions that can be crafted for individual circumstances.
My view is that ACS journals offer high value and high impact at competitive pricing. The quality and the value of the trusted, peer reviewed information provided by ACS journals is a very good value vs. other publishers.
3. What is your stance on the ACS’s executive compensation packages?
Full transparency is important. Perhaps a C&EN comment on the process that is used would help get everyone on the same page as to what is actually in place and the process that is used to determine compensation.
You may remember that the Board held a town meeting on Executive Compensation after Council in Fall, 2005, and perhaps a refresher is in order via a C&EN comment. C&EN calls attention to the ACS Form 990 filing each year and tells readers how to access that document on acs.org. Here’s the link to the 990 notice on page 6 of C&EN.
4. What are your thoughts on the recent ACS vs. Leadscope case? Do you believe that society records pertaining to the lawsuit—including legal fees—should be made public?
Full transparency is important.
The background as I recall is that all public reports on Leadscope in the early days were modulated by the fact that it was active litigation. The events relating to the litigation go back to 1998. For a long time, virtually nothing happened, then there was the trial.
For nearly a year after the settlement in 2012, an extensive Q&A was advertised on the front page of the ACS website. It can still be found at:
One of the difficulties I think with this case is it spanned quite a number of years perhaps making it difficult to follow. My impression is there were regular updates in C&EN over the course of the legal proceedings as the case unfolded, reports in Council of the case status by the Chair of the Board, as well as updates in the Councilor Bulletin. Perhaps a summary in C&EN tying all of the bits and pieces together that were published over time as the case unfolded would be helpful with links to the publically available information. My understanding is that the Chair of the Board reports which include Leadscope are posted on the ACS website.
The most recent report on Leadscope and the financial impact on ACS was by the Chair of the Board and was presented in Council last Spring. I believe his remarks are posted on the ACS web.
My understanding is that the proceedings of this case are in the public record. To read a summary of the case prepared by the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Office of Public Information, click here: http://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2012/SCO/0918/101335.asp
5. What one specific item would you, as ACS President, make your first priority to improve the public perception of chemistry?
Outreach. Chemistry improves the lives of all. Communicating specific examples such as chemistry’s role in clean water, food safety, medicinal improvements, diagnostic techniques, etc. that the general public experiences daily, but does not identify as chemistry. This would help make the connection between the role of chemistry and the improvements the general public experiences in daily life because of the contributions of chemists and chemistry. The ACS Landmarks Program does this to some degree. During the International Year of Chemistry, many examples of how chemistry improves life daily were posted on the ACS website. There is an opportunity to go the next step and more broadly communicate these.
6. What one specific item would you, as ACS President, make your first priority to improve the employment situation for chemists?
Ensure that all members and all chemists know of and have access to the many ACS employment tools and services already in place. Work with staff and members to further enhance, expand and improve these tools.
7. What is your favorite chemical compound with respect to color or smell?
My favorite chemical compound is caffeine, especially delivered in chocolate. It was my first total synthesis as an undergraduate.