Mistakes from the Job Search: The Kitty Interview

May 5th, 2013

Now that my job search is over, I can share all of the stupid things I did and instances where I completely fouled up. This story is, by far, the most mortifying of all my search-related experiences…

After reviewing the application packages they receive for faculty positions, most schools do a round of phone interviews before deciding on which candidates to invite for on-site interviews. Few things are more exciting in your job search than being asked to schedule a phone interview, because it often represents the first meaningful acknowledgment of receipt (and advancement) of your application package. Most of the applications you submit get sucked into a vacuum where you never hear that you’ve been rejected until six months later.

After submitting an application in early October to a school in the Pacific Northwest, I received a phone call three weeks later from the chairman of the department asking to schedule a Skype interview. Great. This was the first time I’d been asked to do a video interview, but I have a Skype account and a computer with a webcam, so everything was ready to go. While I rarely use Skype, I had used it to talk with a friend in China only two months prior.

On the day of the interview, I changed into a dress shirt in my office, logged on to Skype, and awaited the call. When I answered, my video stream popped up normally for a second, but quickly changed to the following:


While I could see the search committee just fine, they saw me as a sad kitten. I know this because (i) I could see my feed in a small box on my screen, and (ii) the professors on the committee were looking at their screen and chuckling. What’s worse is that every time I talked, the kitten’s mouth would open and close. I was mortified.

I started frantically scrolling down all of the menus in Skype trying to remedy the situation. What the hell was happening? No one else ever uses my computer, and I was certain I hadn’t adjusted any of the settings in Skype. It had worked fine just two months earlier.

After trudging through the first three minutes of the interview while trying to fix the stream—a major distraction—the chairman suggested that I just kill the video and proceed on audio only. I guess it is hard to have a serious discussion about chemistry with a talking kitten?

I thought the rest of the interview went well—really well. I made a call sheet for every phoner that summarized the points I wanted to make, and putting that on the screen allowed me to refocus and get my head back into the game.

When the call was over, I resumed the effort of determining what had happened. A friend on Facebook pointed me to this blog post. It turns out that Skype is not to blame; it is some sort of default setting in the webcam software on Dell computers. Why you would set a kitten avatar as a default is beyond my comprehension, but there you go. It turns out that another user had the same experience just a couple of days later.

I sent a follow up e-mail to the chair thanking him for the interview and sharing what I had discovered about the problem.


No worries! It’s an understandable problem and the interview worked well doing it audio only (we still had your Skype profile picture to look at, so it wasn’t actually all that different). It was nice talking to you.



On Oct 30, 2012, at 3:50 PM, “Paul Bracher” <bracher-at-caltech/edu> wrote:


I wanted to thank you and the rest of the committee for taking the time to chat earlier today. I had a great time, aside from the mortification associated with my bizarre video feed. It seems that I am not the first person to fall victim to Dell’s webcam software:


A number of my friends in lab have died laughing, but you have my profound apologies. I would have preferred that you and the committee had been able to see the enthusiasm on my face during our discussion. I remain very excited about the position at —————!

All the best,
Paul “the Kitten” Bracher

The response was gracious, but the damage was done. I think what was especially damaging about the situation was that you have some guy who has put together a decent Web site, runs a blog, and stresses the importance of incorporating new technology into his teaching proposals, yet he can’t figure out how to use Skype properly. In hindsight, I should have done another test run, instead of thinking that my use of Skype two months prior was sufficient.

After radio silence for the next month, I assumed the worst. The stages of the search seem to progress pretty quickly once they’ve started, so when you’ve lost contact for several weeks, it’s usually a bad sign. My suspicions were confirmed in February:

Dear Paul,

It was a pleasure to talk to you a couple months ago. I write to inform you that ————— has offered the Assistant Professor in Organic Chemistry position to another candidate. The decision was very difficult and time consuming (which is why you’re only just hearing back from us), as you were in a field of outstanding candidates.

I would like to convey my appreciation for your interest in —————. Please accept my best wishes for the future development of your career.


Chair, Search Committee

The cold sting of rejection. Oh well. Who knows what could have been were it not for the kitty interview?

16 Responses to “Mistakes from the Job Search: The Kitty Interview”

  1. Carsten Says:

    Ouch. Amazing that this continues to bite people more than 3 years after I wrote that blog post. Yours is definitely the worst story I’ve heard stemming from this problem so far.

  2. Ratmir Says:

    it would have been even more funny if they invited you for a real interview and you showed up dressed up as a kitten. In fact, if you get invited to give talk at the XXXXX university, you could still do that. =)

  3. wenchy Says:

    Dying laughing. So good.

  4. Chemjobber Says:

    Since we’re telling bad interview stories, I’ll commiserate and say that I got an on-site interview from a place that would have been perfect. Everything was going great, and then a prominent senior person (if I said their name and their publication, everyone would know exactly who they were) asked a terribly simple (but tricky) question that I did not have an answer for.

    Close to five years later, it still hurts.

  5. Curious Wavefunction Says:

    Are you sure it wasn’t Sheldon? Glad you ultimately found a good position though.

  6. Former Merck Chemist Says:

    Oh, I am also feeling that cold sting rather often, as I am trying to change jobs. They say that it makes us stronger though :)

  7. Untenured Prof Says:

    Brilliant story Paul! On my first Skype interview I was in the middle of a trip home and had to position my head to block all the religious paraphernalia on the wall behind the computer which was visible on the video.

  8. Slurpy Says:

    Paul – I’m sorry, but I laughed.

    CJ, can you share the question, at least

  9. wolfie Says:

    The origin of life :


    L’origine du monde, du Gustave Courbet.

    (EDIT BY PAUL: I have disabled the link because it goes to a famous painting that is *very* not safe for work. Feel free to paste it into your browser if you are interested.)

  10. wolfie Says:

    Look, I did not meet the right University in my first try either, although it was the most reputable and oldest in Germany. And No. 1 of Chemistry Departments, exempt of Max-Planck-Institutes. But – what not is, may come.

    Was nicht ist, kann noch kommen.

  11. chm Says:

    Paul – sorry that you did not get this position. I also think that failing in an area where you were supposed to excel killed your chances.
    But for what its worth you certainly made my day, when I read that story.

  12. RB Woodweird Says:

    They had to give the position to Dr. Dog because of allergies in the faculty.

  13. Postonenko Says:

    I am having a phone interview next week. Do you have any tips/advice? What questions should I expect?

  14. Tim Johnson Says:

    Literally laughing out loud, that is ridiculously funny. Also, this blog is an excellent way to procrastinate studying for the final.

  15. Dave Aronson Says:

    This would make a great submission for the “Tales from the Interview” section of TheDailyWTF.com!

  16. specialist Says:

    Excellent web site. A lot of useful information here.
    I’m sending it to a few friends ans additionally sharing in delicious.

    And obviously, thank you to your effort!

Leave a Reply