Breslow and Dinosaurs in JACS, Oh My

April 12th, 2012

You all know that origin-of-life research is near and dear to my heart, and you’re probably sick of how often I lament that the problem has not taken root in chemical academia despite the fact that it almost certainly requires a chemical solution. One of the few PIs at a top university who has dabbled in the field is Ronald Breslow, University Professor at Columbia and a past president of the ACS. Breslow just published this little diddy as a perspective in JACS:

First of all, how often do you see a single-author paper in JACS anymore? It is kind of refreshing. It also means that you can attribute 100% of the content to Breslow, including the ChemDraw structures:

What the hell is that? If I drew that structure on a slide in grad school, my committee would have eviscerated me.

Anyway, let’s get down to the science. Breslow’s premise is that you can take alpha-methyl amino acids found in non-racemic mixtures in meteorites—generated by selective destruction of one enantiomer by circularly polarized UV light—and “use” these compounds to generate non-racemic mixtures of sugars (which are also found as moieties in nucleic acids). Since meteors hit the early Earth with great frequency, maybe one or more of these chiral amino acids was the origin of life’s homochirality. It is an interesting idea and one worth keeping in mind. We could argue all day about how unlikely the scenario is, but this field needs to collect more neat ideas accompanied by simple demonstrations. That said, I take issue with the premise of the paper as outlined in the Introduction:

In 1969 a carbonaceous chondritic meteorite landed in Murchison Australia carrying many organic compounds. These compounds were apparently able to survive the frictional heating as the meteorite passed through our atmosphere since they were initially at ca. 10K, and chondritic meteorites are pieces of rock, with low thermal conductivity, from the asteroid belts that surround the sun. When the meteorite was split open the interior was still cold enough to freeze water.

Among the compounds identified were the amino acids alanine, valine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, proline, and leucine, which were racemic, with equal mixtures of the L and D forms, along with achiral glycine. However, five amino acids were found that had methyl groups instead of hydrogens on their alpha positions (Figure 1), and these had a range of small excesses of the enantiomers originally described as the L amino acids (in modern terminology they are the S enantiomers). Since that time, these and other α‐methyl amino acids with small excesses of the S enantiomer have been found in the Murchison, Murray, and Orgueil meteorites (ref 1).

The whole point of why the Murchison meteorite is so interesting is that while the “natural” amino acids in it were initially thought to be racemic, subsequent analyses revealed them to have enantiomeric excesses.  I could be missing more recent analyses, but I don’t think so. Breslow should check out these seminal papers (1 2) and revise his background before the paper is “truly” published in JACS.

It is things like the odd ChemDraw structures and completely wrong information in the background that make me question the quality of peer review in JACS (and in all of chemistry, for that matter). I think one should also question the fairness of the editors, for I cannot imagine that this paper would have made it anywhere near publication in JACS if the author were Assistant Professor Joe Schmoe from Sunny Valley Technical College. But that said, the editors of JACS are the sole arbiters of what is “worthy” of publication in JACS, so I’ll just accept it and move on.

Normally, I wouldn’t blog about an otherwise run-of-the-mill paper about the origin of life, but this paper has really taken off in the world of popular science thanks to what amounts to a poetic thought by Breslow used to close the paper:

An implication from this work is that elsewhere in the universe there could be life forms based on D amino acids and L sugars, depending on the chirality of circular polarized light in that sector of the universe or whatever other process operated to favor the L α‐methyl amino acids in the meteorites that have landed on Earth. Such life forms could well be advanced versions of dinosaurs, if mammals did not have the good fortune to have the dinosaurs wiped out by an asteroidal collision, as on Earth. We would be better off not meeting them.

Since you are a reader of blogs, you will recognize this paragraph for what it is: a silly piece of fluff meant to close an otherwise esoteric piece on a humorous note. I’ve got no problem with that. We can argue over whether the joke is funny, but the attempt at humor is obvious…

…except to the staff in the ACS Pressroom, for they issued the following press release to promote the paper. I am copying it here verbatim because these things are intended for distribution—and because it is ridiculous.

Could “advanced” dinosaurs rule other planets?

Evidence for the Likely Origin of Homochirality in Amino Acids, Sugars, and Nucleosides on Prebiotic Earth
Journal of the American Chemical Society

New scientific research raises the possibility that advanced versions of T. rex and other dinosaurs — monstrous creatures with the intelligence and cunning of humans — may be the life forms that evolved on other planets in the universe. “We would be better off not meeting them,” concludes the study, which appears in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

In the report, noted scientist Ronald Breslow, Ph.D., discusses the century-old mystery of why the building blocks of terrestrial amino acids (which make up proteins), sugars, and the genetic materials DNA and RNA exist mainly in one orientation or shape. There are two possible orientations, left and right, which mirror each other in the same way as hands. This is known as “chirality.” In order for life to arise, proteins, for instance, must contain only one chiral form of amino acids, left or right. With the exception of a few bacteria, amino acids in all life on Earth have the left-handed orientation. Most sugars have a right-handed orientation. How did that so-called homochirality, the predominance of one chiral form, happen?

Breslow describes evidence supporting the idea that the unusual amino acids carried to a lifeless Earth by meteorites about 4 billion years ago set the pattern for normal amino acids with the L-geometry, the kind in terrestial proteins, and how those could lead to D-sugars of the kind in DNA.

“Of course,” Breslow says, “showing that it could have happened this way is not the same as showing that it did.” He adds: “An implication from this work is that elsewhere in the universe there could be life forms based on D-amino acids and L-sugars. Such life forms could well be advanced versions of dinosaurs, if mammals did not have the good fortune to have the dinosaurs wiped out by an asteroidal collision, as on Earth. We would be better off not meeting them.”

What. The. Hell. Some booger-eating PR guy on 16th Street jumped to the end of the manuscript and took Breslow’s joke at face value. Then, his/her editor never thought to question the idea, and sent the press release out in the weekly PressPac. Now, the ACS is the laughing stock of the world of scientific publishing and popular science writing.

I guess we’ve learned nothing from the NASA/Wolfe-Simon/Arsenic Life episode. Why the hell do these things always seem to happen to origin-of-life chemistry?

:/

See also:

Just Like Cooking
Chemistry-Blog
Pharyngula
David Bradley’s Sciencebase
The Awl


20 Responses to “Breslow and Dinosaurs in JACS, Oh My”

  1. Wavefunction Says:

    It’s interesting; I read that paper a few days ago and I my reaction to the part about dinosaurs was completely neutral. Guess I was totally ok with the humor.

  2. antiaromatic Says:

    With regards to the “peer review”, these perspectives don’t really get reviewed. They are invited by the Editor as a contribution that’s more or less a review article. Not that it affects the science, it’s just something that’s worth noting.

  3. Paul Says:

    Perhaps “joke” is not as accurate as “light-hearted banter” or “piece of frivolity”. Either way, the PR people at ACS should have known better.

    Also, a commenter on Just Like Cooking has brought up that this paper could be considered a case of self-plagiarism when compared to:

    Tet Lett, 2011, 53, 2028-2032, Erratum
    Republished: Tet Lett, 2011, 53, 4228-4232

    But as antiaromatic notes above, these “perspective” manuscripts are given wide berths.

  4. Paul Says:

    Given the publication nightmare described by the links above, perhaps this paper is cursed.

    On the plus side, four CV entries for the price of one!

  5. Rhenium Says:

    I was about to say “I read that paper months ago” when I realized it was a straight up re-hash of the Tett Lett paper.

  6. qed Says:

    Shame on the ACS, really. Reading this made me ill – A stupid press-release which is so over-hyped as to be recognizable as b.s. by anyone with two working cells (press officers excluded). This give a completely distorted picture of what scientific research is like to the ignorant. Stuff like this hurts and inflames anti-science attitudes.

  7. J.S. Boc Says:

    There’s a Huffington Post story that picks up on the press release.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/12/advanced-dinosaurs-alien-chemistry_n_1421414.html

    Breslow’s comment to them doesn’t make it sound like he was joking!

  8. KS Says:

    One reason that Breslow can publish an article like this and Assistant Professor Joe Schmoe from Sunny Valley Technical College cannot is that Breslow has a reputation that he can loose.

  9. IO Says:

    “One reason that Breslow can publish an article like this and Assistant Professor Joe Schmoe from Sunny Valley Technical College cannot is that Breslow has a reputation that he can loose.”

    That he has lost.

  10. Stu Says:

    This Isr. J. Chem. paper: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijch.201100019/abstract is very similar to both the Tet. Lett. and JACS papers…

    Also, what is Tet. Lett. doing. When you correct an article, you don’t just republish with new page numbers!!

  11. Paul Says:

    @Stu: Yes, what a clusterf…

    Also, I am always particularly fond of when someone comes up with a theory about the OoL then insists that it had to have been what happened. Breslow believes that his idea is hands-down the most likely origin of homochirality…something that occurred four BILLION years ago, a period of time in the history of the planet about which we have very little data. Breslow’s idea is neat, but I wouldn’t push my chips all-in behind it.

    I think people in the field would be wise to keep an open mind about the theories that get floated around. After all, Socrates was the wisest man in Greece because at least he knew that he knew nothing.

  12. wolfie Says:

    because real life is more complex than an ordinary chemist may think, and the world is, too

  13. Chemistry Blog » Blog Archive » Space dinosaurs, the sage continues Says:

    [...] week I , and several others , wrote about the extraordinary and unfounded conclusions published in a JACS perspective, that [...]

  14. Paul Says:

    Take a look at @stuartcantrill‘s stellar page-by-page identification of self-plagiarism in Breslow’s “dinosaur” paper. What a farce!

    Page 1
    Pages 2/3
    Pages 4/5

  15. Scientific Press Releases [Link] « Macdrifter Says:

    [...] You know what makes me skeptical about a research project? A press release. [...]

  16. What the ACS Must Do Regarding the Dinosaur Paper | ChemBark Says:

    [...] previously analyzed Breslow’s homochirality paper in JACS and its accompanying press release. The content of the [...]

  17. Breslow’s Chirality Paper: More Than Just Alien Dinosaurs | Healthcare Says:

    [...] office, most cluelessly, decided to make that throwaway line the focus of their press release, and much confusion [...]

  18. Link Collection: Space Dinosaur Paper | ChemBark Says:

    [...] – ChemBark – “Breslow and Dinosaurs in JACS, Oh My” – Analysis of the science in the paper and the bungled press [...]

  19. The Sceptical Chymist: Blogroll: Space dinosaurs! : The Sceptical Chymist Says:

    [...] words in the good-humoured tone in which they were surely intended. Paul Bracher, who blogs at ChemBark, has worked in the origin-of-life field, and actually discussed the scientific content of the paper [...]

  20. Dinosaurios más avanzados podrían regir otros planetas, según estudio científico Says:

    [...] Red Neo: Sucesos de la Matrix / Ufologia Fuente: RonaldBreslow [...]


Leave a Reply

*