The 2010 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Part I: Revisiting 2007

August 22nd, 2010

ChemBark Medallion

In anticipation of the upcoming announcement (on October 6th) of this year’s Nobel Prize in chemistry, ChemBark oddsmakers will examine the competition in an unprecedented three-part series.  First up: a quick look back at our previous predictions.

We last posted odds for the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 2007.  At the time, our line had been extensively revised on the heels of structural biologist Roger Kornberg’s surprise win.  (Who saw that coming?  He wasn’t even a member of the ACS when he won.)

Here’s how the rundown looked back in 2007:

The Field (everything not listed below), 3-1
Molecular Studies of Gene Recognition, Ptashne, 15-1
Nuclear Hormone Signaling, Chambon/Evans/Jensen, 15-1
Fluorescent Probes/GFP, Tsien/Prasher/Shimomura, 15-1
Modern Surface Chemistry, Somorjai/Ertl/Whitesides/Nuzzo/+/–, 15-1
Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings, Suzuki/Heck/Sonogashira/Tsuji/+/–, 17-1
Instrumentation/Techniques in Genomics, Venter/+, 19-1
Biological Membrane Vesicles, Rothman/Schekman/+, 19-1
Techniques in DNA Synthesis, Caruthers/Hood/+, 19-1
Molecular Structure of the Ribosome, Steitz/Moore/Yonath/+/–, 29-1
Telomeres & Telomerases, Blackburn/Greider/Szostak, 29-1
Application of Lasers to the Study of Chemical Reactions, Zare, 39-1
Bioinorganic Chemistry, Lippard/Holm/Gray/+/–, 39-1
Mechanistic Enzymology, Walsh/Knowles/Abeles, 49-1
Combinatorial Chemistry/DOS, Schreiber/+, 49-1
Pigments of Life, Battersby/+, 49-1
Global Warming, Thatcher/Gore, 99-1
Development of the Birth Control Pill, Djerassi, 99-1
Development of Chemical Biology, Schultz/Schreiber/+, 99-1
Molecular Modeling and Assorted Applications, Karplus/Houk/Schleyer/+/–, 99-1
Organic Synthesis, Evans/Danishefsky/Nicolaou/Ley/Trost/Stork/Wender/Kishi/+/–, 149-1
Fluorocarbons, Dupont/Curran/–, 199-1
Dendrimers, Frechet/Tomalia/+, 199-1
Application of NMR to Organic Chemistry, Roberts, 199-1
Understanding of Organic Stereochemistry, Mislow, 199-1
Mechanical Bonds and Applications, Sauvage/Stoddart/+, 199-1
Self-Assembly, Whitesides/Nuzzo/Stang/+/–, 199-1
Noble Gas Reactivity, Bartlett/+, 199-1
Tissue Engineering, Langer/+, 199-1
Contributions to Bioorganic Chemistry, Breslow/Eschenmoser/+, 199-1
Molecular Recognition, Dervan/+, 399-1
Development of Nanotechnology, Lieber/Whitesides/Alivisatos/Seeman/+/–, 399-1
Astrochemistry, Oka, 399-1
Zeolites, Flanigan, 399-1
Molecular Machines, Stoddart/Tour/+/–, 499-1
Studies in the Origin of Life, Miller/Orgel/+/–, 99999-1

Not too bad.  In 2007, Ertl won as a co-favorite listed at 15-1.  In 2008, the green fluorescent protein players also came in as favorites at 15-1.  The ribosome people, who were given odds of 29-1 in 2007, took home the prize last year.  Outside of chemistry, the telomerase people (listed here at 29-1 for chemistry) garnered the 2009 prize in medicine, and Gore (99-1) won the 2007 peace prize for his advocacy related to climate change.

In retrospect, we probably should have shortened the odds across the board for the favorites.  GFP and surface catalysis were obvious candidates that were sure to win, eventually; the uncertainty of just when they’d be recognized is what kept the odds long.

The list above will form the basis for our 2010 list, and oddsmakers at ChemBark’s international headquarters are already hard at work.  The field is wide open compared to past years, since a number of all-but-certain candidates have won and exited the queue.

Is this the year that the popular field of organic synthesis climbs back to Nobel glory?  Will another biologist “steal” the prize in chemistry?  What’s a materials chemist have to do to get some love?

Who knows?  Oh, right…we know, of course.  Yes.  We definitely know.  Stay tuned. 

Next post:  Part II — Criteria for Predicting Winners

5 Responses to “The 2010 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Part I: Revisiting 2007”

  1. Chemjobber Says:

    I hear the issue is the nominating committee, in regards to getting more organic chemists their due.

    Will no one rid me of this troublesome theoretical chemist?

  2. Neil Says:

    @Chemjobber The nominations are from (

    1. Swedish and foreign members of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences;
    2. Members of the Nobel Committees for Chemistry;
    3. Nobel Laureates in Chemistry;
    4. Permanent and assistant professors in the sciences of Chemistry at the universities and institutes of technology of Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway, and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm;
    5. Holders of corresponding chairs in at least six universities or university colleges selected by the Academy of Sciences with a view to ensuring the appropriate distribution over the different countries and their seats of learning; and
    6. Other scientists from whom the Academy may see fit to invite proposals.

    And the selection committee is then (

    Lars Thelander Professor Emeritus in Physiological Chemistry
    Astrid Gräslund Professor of Biophysics
    Jan-Erling Bäckvall Professor of Organic Chemistry
    Måns Ehrenberg Professor of Molecular Biology
    Sven Lidin Professor of Inorganic Chemistry

    So this year at least 2 out of the 5 are ‘proper’ chemists! Huzzah!

  3. Saul Knapp Says:

    Howdy, I do think your site may be having browser compatibility problems. When I take a look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in Internet Explorer, it’s got some overlapping issues. I simply wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, wonderful website!

  4. Hannelore Venters Says:

    Hi there it’s me, I am also visiting this web site daily, this website is in fact nice and the viewers are really sharing good thoughts.

  5. Shari Spaulding Says:

    What’s up, this weekend is pleasant in favor of me, since this time i am reading this wonderful educational article here at my residence.

Leave a Reply